Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25120/2026bail granted

Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25120 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2026 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Sunny Kumar Son of Bullu Ram @ Bablu Ram Resident of village - Chakdi, P.S.- Asthawan, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) of BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have impersonated and appeared in examination in place of the original candidate.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2026 having clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25120 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif /concerned Court below in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026.

7. As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If the petitioner is found to be involved in any other case then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted.

8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after being released on bail is directed to mark their attendance at local police station on first Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) sanjeev/- U T