Dhruvnath Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9533 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Dhruvnath Singh Son of Dudhnath Singh 2.

Vinod Kumar Singh Son of Late Dudhnath Singh 3.

Dharmendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Dudhnath Singh All are Resident of village- Umdha, Pragana-Bal, Police Station- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran (Chapra) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Bihar Land Tribunal Patna through its Member (Judicial) 3.

The Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra 4.

The Additional Collector, Saran at Chpara 5.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar Chapra, District- Saran 6.

Sheo Mangal Singh Son of Satya Narain Singh resident of Village- Umdha, Pragana- Bal, Police Station-Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran (Chapra) 7.1. Arvind Kumar Singh, Son of late Jagmohan Singh 7.2. Vijay Kumar Singh, Son of late Jagmohan Singh 7.3. Sunil Kumar Singh, Son of Late Jagmohan Singh. All are Resident of 100 Arya Nagar Colony (Marwari Colony) Maida Toli Machharhatta Lodikatra Patna City Naga Patna City Bihar- 800008. 7.4. Sikandar Singh, Son of late Jagmohan Singh, Resident of Krishna Mandir Maida Toli, Marwari Colony, Patna City, Patna-800008. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bashishtha Narayan Mishra,Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.A.G.

For respondent No.7 : Mr. Nirmal Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Nirmal Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.7 and learned counsel for the State.

In view of the judgment in the case of Sudhakar Jha

Patna High Court CWJC No.9533 of 2020(5) dt.15-07-2024 2/2 Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. with analogous cases, reported in 2023(6)BLJ 397, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application. Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U