Arun Choudhari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26621 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -88 Year- 2017 Thana -DINARA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Arun Choudhari, son of Late Sant Choudhari, resident of Village- Rajpur, Police Station- Natwar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dinara P.S. Case No. 88 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 413 and 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
From the written report, it appears that name of this petitioner has been disclosed by Mohan Choudhary who was arrested by the police. Besides disclosure of name of the petitioner by Mohan Choudhary, there is no specific overt act against him. It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26621 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017 2/2 weeks from today, in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 88 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Lal Bihari Paswan, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bikramganj, Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T