← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23808/2025bail granted

Jimdar Ray @ Jimdar Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-17Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23808 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2023 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Jimdar Ray @ Jimdar Prasad Yadav S/O Ram Sewak Ray @ Ram Sewak Prasad Yadav R/O Village- Hanuman Naar, P.S- Dumra, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate :

Ms. Divya Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 405 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 588.300 litres of liquor was recovered from Scorpio.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23808 of 2025(2) dt.17-04-2025 2/2 liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2025 and has ten criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 405 of 2023. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T