Ameet Kumar Gupta v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3882 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5468 of 2013 ====================================================== Ameet Kumar Gupta Son of Sri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Resident of VillageBarachatti (Bara), Police Station and Post office-Barachatti, District-Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through Secretary namely Chandra Chaturvedi Department of Ministry of Petroleum, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. A.Viswanadha Sarma the General Manager (L.P.G.) Bharat Bhawan, 4 AND 6, Currim Bhai Road, Ballard Estate, Post Box No.688, Mumbai.

3. Rajeev Jaiswal the Territory Manager (LPG), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Industrial Area, Fatuha Patna.

4. Bala Murgan D. through State of Bihar, the District Magistrate, Gaya.

5. Dina Shankar Singh The Circle officer, Gaya.

6. Ankita Singh Daughter of Shyam Shankar Prasad Singh Resident of Quarter No.TSL 553, Baridih, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand State. .... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. None For the BPCL : Mr Madhuresh Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 No one appears for the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the opposite-party of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited submits on instructions that the order under contempt has been duly complied with by disposing of the complaint filed by the petitioner and thereafter the order disposing of the complaint itself has been challenged in another writ petition being CWJC No. 21224/2013.

Patna High Court MJC No.3882 of 2013 (2) dt.05-05-2016 2/2 In the above circumstances, the order under contempt having been complied with, the contempt petition is dismissed.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) S.Pandey/- U