Md. Shajid @ Sanaur @ Md. Shajid Hasan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35822 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2020 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Md. Shajid @ Sanaur @ Md. Shajid Hasan Son Of Md. Hasan Jan Resident Of Village- Balat, P.S.- Rahika, District- Madhubani. 2.

Ibne Ikbal Son Of Arif Ikbal Resident Of Village- Sagauna, P.S. Rahika, District- Madhubani.

3.

Md. Amanullah Son Of Late Mohsin @ Kallu Resident Of Village- Sagauna, P.S. Rahika, District- Madhubani.

4.

Md. Ashrafuddin @ Md. Ashraf Son Of Md. Allauddin Resident Of VillageSagauna, P.S. Rahika, District- Madhubani. 5.

Md. Nabab Son Of Nashim @ Shamim Resident Of Village- Sagauna, P.S. Rahika, District- Madhubani.

6.

Md. Gulab Son Of Anwarul Haque Resident Of Village- Sagauna, P.S. Rahika, District- Madhubani.

7.

Shahid @ Juhi Son Of Late Shahjad Resident Of Village- Sagauna, P.S. Rahika, District- Madhubani.

8.

Aley Navi Son Of Sajid Resident Of Village- Sagauna, P.S. Rahika, DistrictMadhubani. 9.

Momtaj @ Pappu Son Of Late Md. Hasan Resident Of Village- Sagauna, P.S. Rahika, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Satya Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal, APP For the informant :

Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-02-2022 Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding. The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35822 of 2021(2) dt.14-02-2022 2/2 for the State and learned counsel for the informant through virtual mode.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy. From perusal of the record, it appears that the process under Section 83 of Cr.P.C. has already been issued. In the said circumstances, the present anticipatory bail is not maintainable in connection with Rahika P.S. case No.130/2020, pending in the court of Sri Ashutosh Ravi, J.M. 1st class, Madhubani. The present application for anticipatory bail stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to seek their legal remedy in accordance with law.

The present order shall not prejudice in the court below, if any application seeking the legal remedy by the petitioners is made before the court below.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T