← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6547/2007dismissed

Prakash Mahton And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-02Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6547 of 2007 ======================================================

1. Prakash Mahton son of Khargi Mahton

2. Ram Jee Mahton son of Late Jagdambi Mahton

3. Sito Mahto son of Late Baidhu Mahton

4. Noonulal Mahton son of Late Gangoo Mahton

5. Arjun Mahton son of Late Baidhu Mahton

6. Rajo Mahton son of Late Srilal Mahton & Bhim Mahton

7. Deepu Mistri son of Late Hari Mistri

8. Biranchi Mahton son of Late Devi Mahton

9. Raghunath Mahton son of Late Puna Mahto

10. Tripit Mahton son of Late Lakhan Mahton Petitioner nos. 1 to 10 are resident of Village Fadarpur (Faridpur), P.S.Birupur,District Lakhisarai

11. Ram Chandra Saw son of Late Tukan Sao

12. Anup Mahton son of Late Lildhari Mahton

13. Most. Maya Devi W/o Later Late Jago Mahton

14. Balo Mahton son of Late Mitlal Mahto

15. Mahendra Mahton son of Late Chhatradhari Mahton

16. Brahmdeo Mahton son of Late Teko Mahton

17. Most. Gayatri Devi W/o Late Raj Kumar Mahton

18. Dund Mahton son of Late Ritlal Mahton

19. Dham Mahton son of Late Rupan Mahton

20. Kishori Mahton son of Late Mangal Mahton

21. Chandrika Mahton son of Late Lakhan Mahton

22. Ram Baran Mahton son of Late Tanik Mahton

23. Gowardhan Mahton son of Late Badri Mahton

24. Most. Sharda Devi W/o Ram Charitar Mahton

25. Ramwati Devi W/o Jai Ram Mahton

26. Nikhedi Mahton son of Late Bhoju Mahton

27. Ram Khelawan Mahton son of Late Thakuri Mahton

28. Shobha Devi @ Most.Rambha Devi W/o Late Narayan Sao

29. Sri Na;rayn Sao son of Late Miahri Sao

30. Manoj Mahto son of Ramchandra Mahto

31. Sri Kant Mahton son of Late Gano Mahton

32. Siya Saran Mahton son of Late Lekha Mahto

33. Most Kanti Devi W/o Late Jago Mahton

34. Ramashish Mahton son of Late Bhagat Mahton

35. Yogendra Mahto son of Ram Sharan Mahton

36. Radhey Shyam Mahton son of Late Lalo Mahton

37. Ram Padarath Sao son of Late Moti Sao

38. Nepali Sao son of Late Dukhi Sao

39. Sardari Ram son of Late Jahuri Ram

40. Miraima Devi W/o Late Loknath Mahton

41. Dhanbarti Devi W/o Laate Sudama Mahton

42. Ramdeo mahton son of Late Jhandu Mahton

43. Hardeo Mahton son of Late Jhandu Mahton

44. Baso Mahton son of Late Bhado Mahton

45. Ramjee Mahton son of Late Jhandu Mahton

46. Shivkumar Mahton son of Late Teka Mahton

47. Ram Chandra Mahton son of Late Sarjun Mahton

Patna High Court CWJC No.6547 of 2007 (4) dt.02-08-2016 2/3

48. Bhanso Mahton son of Late Tonril Mahto

49. Summa Devi W/o Rameshwar Mahton

50. Shailwa Devi W/o Lte Ram Baran Mahton

51. Most. Girja Devi W/o Late Laxmi Mahton

52. Ishwar Mahton son of Late Budhan Mahton

53. Saran Mahton son of Late Ram Swaroop Mahton

54. Dasrath Mahton son of Late Guru Sahay Mahton

55. Ram Charitra Mahton son of Late Kamaldhari Mahton

56. Most Jitani Devi W/o Late Nirbhay Mahton

57. Jago Mahton son of Late Faudari Mahton

58. Surjee Devi W/o Late Radhey Mahton

59. Brahmdeo Mahton son of Late Saryug Mahton

60. Shambhu Mahto son of Late Saryug Mahton

61. Sukhdeo Mahton son of Late Ram Mahton

62. Ganga Mahto son of Saryu Mahton

63. Meghan Mahton son of Late Ram Swarup Mahto

64. Suresh Mahton son of Late Bhaso Mahton

65. Guleshwar Mahton son of Late Khiyali Mahton

66. Mahendra Mochi son of late Brahma Mochi

67. Chaniya Devi W/o Late Bino Mahaton

68. Shanichari Devi W/o Bachchu Mahton

69. Jhauri Mahton son of Late Lakhan Mahton

70. Lal Pari Devi W/o Ram Nandi Mahton Petitioner Nos. 11 to 70 are resident of Village Pali, P.S.Birupur, District Lakhisarai ... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Collector and District Magistrate, Lakhisarai

3. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Lakhisarai

4. Sri Abinash Chandra Sharma son of Late Babu Murli Manmohan Prasad Singh

5. Smt.Nilam Sharma W/o Sri Abinash Chandra Sharma, Respondent nos. 4 and 5 are resident of Village Barahiya Taraf, Ghanraj, P.S. land P.O. Barahiya, District Lakhisarai

6. Indu Devi W/o Late Gopal Singh

7. Munni Singh son of Late Shiva Nandan Singh Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are resident of Village Manjhaul, District Begusarai at present residing at Village and P.O. Barahiya, District Lakhisarai .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition, though the name

Patna High Court CWJC No.6547 of 2007 (4) dt.02-08-2016 3/3 of the learned counsel appearing on their behalf is printed in the daily cause list.

On examination of the record, this Court finds that the present writ petition has been filed assailing the validity and correctness of the order dated 24.10.1994 passed in Batai Case No. 227 of 1992-93 by the respondent D.C.L.R., Lakhisarai, as contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition, whereby aforesaid Batai case and its analogous cases was dismissed by the respondent D.C.L.R., Lakhisarai in exercise of his powers under Section 48E of The Bihar Tenancy Act. Admittedly, the impugned order in the case filed on behalf of the petitioners or their ancestors was passed on 24.10.1994 and the present writ petition was filed on 17.05.2007 i.e. after a delay of more than 12 years. Therefore, the writ petition suffers from delay and laches on the part of the petitioners. Furthermore, this Court finds that by order dated 19.02.

2010 the petitioners were directed to take steps for fresh service of notice upon the respondent nos. 6 and 7. Office note dated 01.08.2016 points out that in response of the aforesaid order dated 19.02.2010, neither talbana etc. nor registered cover with A/D has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of notice to the private respondent nos. 6 and 7. From the aforesaid fact it appears that the petitioners have lost their interest in the present proceeding.

For the reasons recorded above, this Court is of the opinion that the writ petition has to fail and is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U