Dayanand Singh And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 50398 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -110 Year- 2015 Thana - PANDARAK District- PATNA ===================================================

1. Dayanand Singh Son of Late Manohar Singh.

2. Lalan Kumar Son of Dayanand Singh Both resident of Mauza Biharibigha, P.S.- Pandarak, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

02. 10.11.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 379 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Considering that the matter was compromised later on and the Petitioners have fair antecedents, let them be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case No. 110 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50398 of 2015 (2) dt.10-11-2015 under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail.

(iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)