Patna High CourtCWJC/22084/2012dismissed

Sanjay Kumar Jha And ANR v. Vijay Kant Jha And ORS

2016-01-21Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.22084 of 2012 (02) dt.21-01-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22084 of 2012 ======================================================

1. SANJAY KUMAR JHA, SON OF SRI KAMESHWAR JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NEONI, TOLE - RUPNAGAR, PARGANA - GOPALPUR, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA

2. SMT. NIRMALA DEVI @ NIRMALA JHA, WIFE OF SRI KAMESHWAR JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NEONI, TOLE - RUPNAGAR, PARGANA - GOPALPUR, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA .... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

1. VIJAY KANT JHA, SON OF LATE RAM LOCHAN JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NAWADA TOLE RAMPUR, P.O. - NAWADA, P.S. - BAHERA, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA

2. SUJAY KANT JHA, SON OF LATE RAM LOCHAN JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NAWADA TOLE RAMPUR, P.O. - NAWADA, P.S. - BAHERA, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA

3. AJAY KANT JHA, SON OF LATE RAM LOCHAN JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NAWADA TOLE RAMPUR, P.O. - NAWADA, P.S. - BAHERA, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA

4. RAMASHRAY YADAV, SON OF KANTIR YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NEONI TOLE GUDAM, P.O. - JAYANTIPUR DATH, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA

5. DINESH YADAV, SON OF KANTIR YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NEONI TOLE GUDAM, P.O. - JAYANTIPUR DATH, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA

6. SMT. DAI SUNARI, WIFE OF SRI MAHESH YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NEONI TOLE GUDAM, P.O. - JAYANTIPUR DATH, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA

7. CHHOTE YADAV, SON OF BANE YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NEORI TOLE DATH, P.O. - JAYANTIPUR DATH, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA .... .... RESPONDENT/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gaurav Govind--Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha with Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha--Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 21-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

The order impugned need not requires interference. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed.

Vikash/- (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) U