Arbind Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23366 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-464 Year-2018 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== ARBIND PASWAN S/o Baban Paswan Resident of Village- Lokeya, Police Station- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 15-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 452, 341, 323, 376, 511, 354, 379, 504, 506 IPC registered in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 464 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and the petitioner is the cousin devar of the informant. There is about two and half months delay in institution of the FIR on 26.10.2018 for the alleged occurrence of 16.08.2018. The accusations are highly improbable in nature. The petitioner is a student of B.Sc. and claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 464 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438

(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23366 of 2019(2) dt.15-04-2019 2/2 ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T