← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23759/2025bail granted

Basant Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-17Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23759 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Basant Manjhi S/o Rajendra Manjhi Resident of village -Nonfarwa, P.S. - Patahi, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Patahi P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 157.29 liters liquor was recovered from shutter's room and the petitioner was apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23759 of 2025(2) dt.17-04-2025 2/2 no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was selling egg at his egg shop and he has got no concern with the shutter's room. The petitioner is in custody since 16.02.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Patahi P.S. Case No. 64 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T