Patna High CourtCWJC/14731/2013disposed

Rekha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-18Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14731 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Rekha Kumari W/O- Sudhir Sah Resident Of Village- Falka, Baba Bishwanath Nagar, Barsoni, Tola, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Falka, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Commissioner Cum Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, I.C.D.S., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

4. The Commissioner, Purnia Division, Purnea Null Null

5. The District Magistrate, Katihar

6. The District Welfare Officer, Katihar

7. The District Programme Officer, Katihar

8. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Katihar

9. The Block Development Officer, Block- Falka, Katihar

10. The Child Development Project Officer, Block- Falka, Katihar

11. Sanju Kumari W/O- Shiv Bilash Yadav Resident Of MohallaBishwanath Nagar, P.S.- Falka, District- Katihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghvendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.11 : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar, SC 11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-07-2016 Heard the parties.

In the present writ petition, petitioner is challenging the appointment of respondent no.11.

Admittedly in the present case petitioner has not moved before the appropriate authority raising his grievance. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will file a proper application before the District Programme Officer, Katihar.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14731 of 2013 (2) dt.18-07-2016 If petitioner files an application before the District Programme Officer, Katihar within a period of three weeks from today, the District Programme Officer, Katihar will examine the case and pass an order in accordance with law but after giving due notice to the private respondent. With the aforesaid observation this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U