← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23812/2025dismissed

Indal Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-06Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23812 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2018 Thana- DARBHANGA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Indal Sahni S/o Late Chhote Sahni R/o Village- Sanathi Dih, ThanaBochahan (Garh), District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mirtyunjay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Darbhanga Town P.S. Case No. 48 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections-457, 380, 401, 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. According to prosecution case, on 13-03-2018, the informant received an information that after cutting down the ATM, situated near J.P. Chowk by means of gas cutter, some unknown thieves committed theft of Rs. 3,63,603/-.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. The FIR has been lodged against unknown. The name of the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23812 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, Teju Sahani and there is no evidentiary value of the confessional statement before the police. The petitioner is in custody since 22-11-2024.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner is involved in other cases of similar nature.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, presently I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly, the same is rejected.

7. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after remaining under custody for a period of one year. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T