Ganesh Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17763 of 2015 ====================================================== Ganesh Mahto S/o late Kamleshwar Mahto Resident of Village-Etwarpur Sisaula, p.s Lalganj, District Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Collector, Vaishali.

3.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms ,Hajipur,Vaishali. 4.

Ram Pratap Mahto 5.

Sri Kishun Mahto 6.

Ramji Mahto 7.

Shyamji Mahto All 4 to 7 are sons of late Sita Ram Mahto null 8.

Munna Mahto 9.

Shankar Mahto Both are Sons of Umit Mahto All are resident of Village - Etwarpur Sisaula, P.s Lalganj, district Vaishali 10.

Suraj 11.

Kailash Mahto Both are sons of late kamleshwar Mahto 12.

Subodh Mahto 13.

Ramchander Mahto 14.

Sunil Mahto All the three are sons of late Ganga Mahto All are resident of Village- Etwarpur Sisaula, P.s Lalganj, District Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lakmesh Marvind, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prashant Pratap, AC to GP 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 21-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs:

"(1) For quashing the order dated 24.6.14 passed by the learned DCLR, Hajipur in Bihar

Patna High Court CWJC No.17763 of 2015(2) dt.21-03-2023 2/2 Land Dispute Resolution Case No. 355 / 2012-13 whereby he has cancelled the Zamabandi created in the name of the petitioner and the respondent 2nd set and directed the Circle Officer, Lal Ganj to create Zamabandi in the name of respondents 4 to 9 and issue rent receipt in their favour."

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the application to move an appropriate application/appeal as provided under the Act. The application is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.

It goes without saying that while considering the application for condonation of delay in filing the aforesaid application/appeal, the concerned statutory authority will take into consideration the time for which the instant application remained pending in this Court.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U