Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51692/2015rejected

Dhruben Yadav @ Dhrubendra Yadav @ Dhrubendra Kumar Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-11-09Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51692 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Dhruben Yadav @ Dhrubendra Yadav @ Dhrubendra Kumar Yadav son of Ram Gulam Yadav

2. Ravindra Yadav son of Ram Gulam Yadav

3. Sanjay Yadav @ Sonu Nigam son of Ram Gulam Yadav

4. Pappu Yadav son of Ravindra Yadav

5. Dhananjay Yadav son of Ram Gulam Yadav,

6. Ashok Yadav @ Dharmendra Yadav son of Ram Gulam Yadav All are residents of village- Sahmora, P.S.- Sonbarsa, DistrictSaharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No.82 of 2015 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 458, 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. It is contended that genesis of the occurrence is land dispute in between the parties. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is general and omnibus. A counter case has also been instituted against the informant and others vide Sonbarsa P.S. Case No.83 of 2015 for the occurrence of the same date.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51692 of 2015 (2) dt.09-11-2015 2/2 Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the application of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail. He has submitted that in the alleged incident several inmates of the informant's family including an eighty years old lady were badly assaulted.

Regard being had to the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. In case the petitioners surrender and seek bail, the same shall be considered on its own merits without being prejudiced in any manner by this order.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- U T