← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25640/2022bail rejected

Gulab Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-02Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25640 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-433 Year-2021 Thana- SIWAN CITY District- Siwan ====================================================== Gulab Ali S/o Ali Haidar @ Haidar Ali Resident of Village- Purani Keela, P.S.- Siwan Town, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing. Let the defect (s), if any, as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks.

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 433 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, the petitioner gave a knife blow in the abdomen of the cousin of the informant and the cousin of the informant succumbed to his injuries while being taken to Patna for treatment. The occurrence took place in the background of some altercation which took place earlier

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25640 of 2022(3) dt.02-12-2022 2/3 between the petitioner and the deceased.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession or at his instance. There is no independent eyewitness except this informant who is the cousin of the deceased. There is no allegation that the petitioner gave repeated knife blow rather it appears a single blow was given. Hence, no offence under Section 302 IPC would be made out. The petitioner is in custody since 20.08.2021 and charge-sheet has been submitted. The petitioner is having clean antecedent. Learned APP as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently oppose the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP submits that the knife blow was given at a vital part of the body i.e. at the belly-button of the deceased and intention to cause death was always there. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant further submits that the postmortem report corroborates the allegation made in the FIR.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the specific nature of allegation against this petitioner of giving the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25640 of 2022(3) dt.02-12-2022 3/3 fatal blow to the cousin of the informant who subsequently died, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail is rejected.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Rajnish/- U T