Chandrika Singh And ORS v. Jichhor Dhobi And ORS

Patna High Court SA No.39 of 1992 (10) dt.05-07-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Second Appeal No.39 of 1992 ====================================================== Chandrika Singh & Ors .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

Jichhor Dhobi & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad Verma Mr. Krishna Murari Kumar Mr. Satyendra Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Pd Bharti Mr. Pramod Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 05-07-2016 Nobody appears on behalf of the appellants.

Perused the office note, from which it transpires that this appeal has stood dismissed for default as against the substituted heir of the deceased respondent no. 1. It further transpires from the memo of appeal that the plaintiffs are the appellants in the appeal against the judgment and decree of reversal . The deceased respondent no. 1 was one of the defendants in the suit and as such after dismissal of this appeal as against the substituted heir of the deceased respondent no. 1 proceeding further in this appeal may result in inconsistent orders or conflicting decrees.

In the result, this appeal is dismissed as incompetent. (V. Nath, J) Ranjan/- U