← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16496/2011disposed

Shankar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-10Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16496 of 2011 ====================================================== Shankar Mishra Son Of Late Khokhu Mishra Resident Of Village + P.O.- Manrakhi, Police Station Raj Nagar, District- Madhubani .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Mahubani

3. Superintendent Of Police, Madhubani

4. Sub Divisional Officer Sadar, Madhubani

5. Dy. S.P. Sadar Madhubani

6. Circle Officer, Rajnagar, Block Office At Rajnagar, District- Madhubani

7. Officer Inchare, Rajnagar, Police Station Rajnagar, District - Madhubani

8. Labour Enforcement Officer, Raj Nagar, District- Madhubani

9. Arun Kamath Son Of Sukhdeo Kamath Resident Of Village And P.O.- Mangrauni, Police Station- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani

10. Sudi Kamath Son Of Bhuwaneshwar Kamath Resident Of Village And P.O.-Mangrauni, Police Station- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani

11. Indra Kumar Kamath Son Of Mohan Kamath Resident Of Village And P.O.-Mangrauni, Police Station- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani

12. Mahbir Kamath Son Of Late Jeetu Kamath Resident Of Village And P.O.-Mangrauni, Police Station- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani

13. Lakhan Kamath Son Of Late Bachha Kamath Resident Of Village And P.O.-Mangrauni, Police Station- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani

14. Jogendra @ Bhogendra Thakur Son Of Buchai Thakur Resident Of Village And P.O.-Mangrauni, Police Station- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ratnakar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Devendra Kr Sinha, AAG 2 For the Private Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 10-09-2015 Heard the parties.

In view of the stand of the respondent-authority that no road is being constructed by the State authority upon the raiyati land of the petitioner, this writ application is being disposed of as it has also been stated that constant vigil is being kept.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16496 of 2011 (9) dt.10-09-2015 Let it be continued.

It is made clear that the disposal of the writ petition would not come in the way of the petitioner in approaching before the competent forum if encroachment reappears upon his raiyati land in future.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U