Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43341/2017bail granted

Diljeet Singh Jambh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43341 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1125 Year- 2016 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Diljeet Singh Jambh, S/O Major Singh Jambh, resident of Bank Colony, P.S. Mandi Mullanpur, District-Ludhiyana (Punjab). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Subhra Sikha, W/O Diljeet Singh Jambh, D/O Shri Virendra Prasad, Permanent R/O 102, Vishwashakuntalam Apartment, Road No. 2, West Shivpuri, P.O. and P.S. Shastri Nagar, District-Patna. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Aditya Nath Pandey, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, complainant and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1125 (C) of 2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and 4 of the D.P. Act. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the complainant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43341 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. It has been submitted by learned counsels for the State and the complainant that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No. 1125 (C) of 2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T