← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7173/2020disposed

M/S Shree Ashok Trading Company v. The State Of Bihar

2021-06-23Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7173 of 2020 ====================================================== M/s Shree Ashok Trading Company A Proprietorship Firm, having its place of business at NH-57, Chakradaha Road, P.S.- Narpatganj, District Araria, through its Proprietor, Ram Gopal Goel, aged about 73 years (male), son of Late Mahavir Prasad Goel, resident of NH-57, Chakradaha Road, P.S.- Narpatganj, District Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Through its Managing Director, Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Prasad Rai Path, R- Block, Road No.2, Patna- 800001.

4.

The Managing Director Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Prasad Rai Path, R- Block, Road No.2, Patna- 800001.

5.

The District Manager Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, District Araria.

6.

The District Magistrate cum Collector Araria. 7.

The Additional District Magistrate (Establishment) cum District Certificate Officer Araria.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suraj Samdarshi, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG For BSFC :

Ms. Anukriti Jaipuriar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2021 Heard Mr. Suraj Samdarshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG for the State and Ms. Anukriti Jaipuriar for the BSFC.

Considering the fact that corrective measure has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.7173 of 2020(9) dt.23-06-2021 2/2 adopted by the Certificate Officer and the impugned order has been recalled, no further indulgence is required, the writ petition is disused of as having become infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U