← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28675/2023bail granted

Akhilesh Sahni @Akhilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-18Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28675 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2023 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== AKHILESH SAHNI @AKHILESH KUMAR SON OF PABITAR SAHNI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DHARMAPUR, PS AND DISTT- VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 35.280 liters of liquor from the house of the petitioner and 9.360 liters of liquor from the house of Vikas Kumar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, it is next submitted that even the alleged recovery is from a house which is a joint family property, as such, it cannot be alleged with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28675 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 certainty that it was the petitioner who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house was within his knowledge and he came to be implicated at the instance of local people but then the FIR does not disclose the name of the local people who disclosed the name of the petitioner which creates doubt with regard to the veracity of the allegations as alleged in the FIR. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 68 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T