Vikas Yadav @ Vikas Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28056 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2024 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Vikas Yadav @ Vikas Kumar Yadav Son Of Late Mahendra Yadav Resident Of Village- Bhabhangawan Ps- Barhara (Krishnagarh), Dist- Bhojpur At Ara ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Rina Sinha, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 325, 427, 447, 354 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. According to F.I.R., on 28.12.2023 at about 8 PM, when the informant was with her two daughters and one gotni in her house, co-accused Anku Yadav entered into the house and started misbehaving with her daughters. It is further alleged that when the informant protested, all the accused persons including this petitioner came there variously armed and assaulted the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that earlier Barhara P. S. Case No. 291 of 2023 was lodged by the petitioner under Section 302 of the Indian Penal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28056 of 2024(2) dt.14-05-2024 2/2 Code against the husband and son of the informant for murdering father of the petitioner and co-accused Anku Yadav has also lodged Barhara P. S. Case No. 220 of 2021 for attempting to murder of mother of the petitioner. Present case is nothing but an attempt to save skin of the informant from the aforesaid cases and to put pressure upon the petitioner. He further submits that though there is specific allegation of assault against the petitioner in the F.I.R. but there is no injury report on the record.
5. Considering the backdrop of the case and the fact that there is no injury report on record, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Barhara P. S. Case No. 02 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T