Om Prakash Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15344 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Om Prakash Singh Son Of Muni Lal Singh Resident Of Village - Sarbu Singh Ka Tola, Post - Khawaspur, P.S. Krishna Garh, District - Bhojpur, Ara
2. Tejan Yadav Son Of Butan Yadav Resident Of Village - Gaura Ke Tola, P.O. Khawaspur, P.S. Krishna Garh, District - Bhojpur, Ara
3. Parmatma Kumar Yadav Son Of Ganesh Yadav Resident Of Village - Hazari Ke Tola, P.S. Krishna Garh, District - Bhojpur, Ara
4. Brajesh Bhushan Son Of Parash Nath Singh Resident Of Village - Sarbu Singh Ka Tola, P.S. Krishna Garh, District - Bhojpur, Ara
5. Jitendra Prasad Singh Son Of Awadhesh Singh Resident Of Village - Sarbu Singh Ka Tola, Post - Khawaspur, P.S. Krishna Garh, District - Bhojpur, Ara .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar, Through The Director General Of Police, State Of Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home ( Police ), Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department ( Personnel Administrative Reforms Department ) Government Of Bihar, Patna
4. The Director, Primary Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna
5. The Superintendent Of Police Kishanganj Cum Chairman Selection Committee, Patna
6. The Commandant ( Samadestha ) Bihar Military Police, Bhojpur
7. The Superintendent Of Police, Chapra .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the State : Mr.Ramadhar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-11-2016 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present.
Petitioner has claimed that he has wrongly been deprived from the appointment on the post of constable against Advertisement Nos. 1 of 2004 and 2 of 2004.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15344 of 2013 (2) dt.19-11-2016 The matter has already been considered in L.P.A. No.831 of 2009. All appointments have already been done and left over vacancy has also been considered in the subsequent advertisement.
As this matter is very old this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter.
Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U