Salim Kuraishi And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31655 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2016 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Salim Kuraishi, son of late Sadik Kuraishi
2. Salima Khatoon, wife of Salim Kuraishi, both residents of village Nabinagar, P.S. Piro, district Bhojpur .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Nasrin Khatoon wife of Pappu Kuraishi, d/o Barkat Kuraishi, resident of village Gorari, P.s. Karakat, district Rohtas .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP 202 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 323, 498A and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioners are parents-in-law of the husband of complainant. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same. In paragraph 9 of the petition it has been stated that the husband of the victim is ready for amicable settlement of dispute and restoration of conjugal life.
In the circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 50 of 2016 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas, or successor Court, subject to the condition
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31655 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and, further, with the condition that the Court below shall notice the parties and take necessary steps for amicable settlement. If the petitioners would be found cooperative in the settlement of dispute and willing for restoration of conjugal life, then, the provisional anticipatory bail shall be confirmed by the Court below, itself, otherwise necessary order would be passed according to law. (Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √