Mritunjay Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33715 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -710 Year- 2012 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA ====================================================== Mritunjay Kumar son of Rabindra Prasad, Resident of Village Dargahi Tola, P.S. Pandarak, District Patna .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Ramnandan Mahto, Son of Late Gulo Mahto, Resident of Village Dargahi Tola, P.S. Pandarak, District Patna .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 01-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 420, 468, 419 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 710 (C)/2012.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event, the entire amount of the loan has since been repaid by the petitioner and thus, the complainant guarantor is absolved of any possible liability.
4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Brajesh Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Barh, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 710
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33715 of 2016 (2) dt.01-09-2016 2/2 (C)/2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence.
(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T