Prince Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1708 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2024 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Prince Singh S/o- Harendra Singh Village- Simri Ps- Nabinagar DistAurangabad ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Yuvraj Dutt S/o- Sunil Ram Village- Kala Dhanaw Ps- Nabinagar DistAurangabad ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-07-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The present Appeal is being filed against the order dated 12.03.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST) cum 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in B.P. No. 186 of 2024 arising out of Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 49 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under section 379, 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 504, 506 of I.P.C. and Section 3 (i) (r) (s) SC/ST (POA) Act whereby regular bail filed by the appellant was rejected.

3. Learned senior counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant and other accused persons snatched Rs. 80,000 and also assaulted and abused the informant by calling his caste name. He has also submitted that paragraph no.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1708 of 2024(4) dt.08-07-2024 2/2 30 of the case diary which is CCTV footage shows that allegation of snatching Rs. 80,000 is false and fabricated. In paragraph no. 30 of the case diary, it is mentioned that the appellant along with other accused persons have been seen assaulting the informant with slaps and even the allegation of abusing by calling his caste name has not been corroborated. The appellant is in custody since 26.02.2024.

4. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

5. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the present appeal is allowed and accordingly, the appellant above-named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (SC/ST) cum 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in connection with B.P. No. 186 of 2024 arising out of Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 49 of 2024. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) ravikr/- U T