Ranjeet Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9112 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -231 Year- 2017 Thana -MANER District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Rai, Son of Krishna Rai

2. Guriya Devi, Wife of Ranjeet Rai Both Resident of Village- Haldi Chapra (Satanna), P.S.- Maner, District- Patna.

3. Somaru Rai, Son of Nibesh Rai,

4. Renu Devi, Wife of Somaru Rai, Both Resident of Village- Nilkanth Tola, Goraiya Asthan, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 23-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 231/2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 304B, 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are family members of the husband of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. From the written report, it appears that the deceased was married with Harendra Rai on 11.07.2016. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9112 of 2018 (3) dt.23-03-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 231/2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Danapur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T