Manohar Tuddu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33919 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2022 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== Manohar Tuddu S/O Late Hoppa Tudu R/O Village- Garha, P.S- Chakai, Distt.- Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence under Sections 143, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 22.11.2022 at about 3 PM. when the informant and his family members were returning to their house, suddenly the FIR named accused persons including this petitioner stopped them and asked to leave Hindu religion and to accept the Christianity only then they would be allowed to go home. It is next alleged that when informant protested, then all the accused persons abused and this petitioner assaulted the brother of the informant Sukhu

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33919 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 2/3 Tudu on his left hand. Thereafter, co-accused Nosen Tudu assaulted the wife of the informant with bricks and stones and co-accused Anjalus Tudu assaulted by fists and slaps, whereas other accused torn the cloth of daughter of informant and tried to outrage her modesty.

4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, due to dispute over pathway, a fight took place between the parties, who are agnates. Petitioner is only alleged to have caused injury on right arm of Sukhu Tudu (brother of informant), which is not vital part of the body. There is no repetition of blow. Petitioner has got clean antecedent and is in custody since 17.01.2024. Chargesheet has been submitted.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the fact that petitioner has caused injury on non-vital part of the body and he has already remained in custody for about six months, having clean antecedent, the prayer for bail of petitioner is allowed.

7. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33919 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 3/3 Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamui in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 304 of 2022.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T