← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25485/2022bail granted

Rohit Kewat @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-10Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25485 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2022 Thana- MEHANDIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

ROHIT KEWAT @ ROHIT KUMAR S/o Baban Kewat R/o MohallaMehandiganj, P.S.- Mehandiganj, District- Patna 2.

Mohit Kewat @ Adil Kumar S/o Baban Kewat R/o Mohalla- Mehandiganj, P.S.- Mehandiganj, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504, 506, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 37(b) (c) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioners in an intoxicated state assaulted the informant and one Sanjay Choudhary and also took Rs. 25,000/- from informant's pocket along with a Jio mobile. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25485 of 2022(2) dt.10-08-2022 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that on account of a dispute relating to parking of vehicle in front of the shop of the petitioner, the present occurrence took place in which the informant falsely alleged that the petitioners were drunk, and as far as snatching of mobile and cash is alleged, the same are ornamental in nature. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the fact that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mehandiganj P.S. Case No. 03 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T