← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35963/2016disposed

Saturohan Yadav @ Shatruhan Yadav @ Shatrughan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-08Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35963 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2016 Thana -LALIT NARAYAN UNIVERSITY DistrictDARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Saturohan Yadav @ Shatruhan Yadav @ Shatrughan Yadav Son of Yogi Yadav Resident of Village - Gangwara Kuppa Tola, Police Station - Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Prasad , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Shankar Das, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(1) (x) of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

The prosecution case is that the informant developed intimacy with the petitioner at the instance of Pinki Devi and Shubhkala Devi. On 11.06.2016 the informant and petitioner went to village Majhigama, stayed there for a night. On 25.06.2016 at the instance of Pinki Devi and Shubhkala Devi the informant went to Delhi with the petitioner, where the petitioner established physical relationship on promise of marriage, but thereafter the informant was abused and life

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35963 of 2016 (2) dt.08-09-2016 threatening was given.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during medical examination the victim has been found between 16-17 years of age and it appears that she of her own went in the company of the petitioner. The medical report does not suggest commission of any sexual act. In view of this Court, the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable in view of the provision of appeal under Section 14A of the S.C./S.T.(Prevention of Atrocities Amendment) Act, 2015, let the learned court below consider the prayer for bail on surrender, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with L.N.M.U. P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga.

With the above observation this application is disposed of.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K./- U T