Bindu Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.21984 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -224 Year- 2017 Thana -BOCHHA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Bindu Ram S/o late Jaikishun Ram Resident of Village- Karnpur Uttari, P.S. Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-04-2018 Heard.
The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Bochahan P.S.Case No.224 of 2017 registered for an offence under Sections 363, 365 and 366 of the IPC.
It has been submitted that the petitioner is full brother of the informant. The informant has concealed this fact. On account of old enmity, he has implicated in the case of kidnapping of his daughter. The daughter of the informant herself left her house and married with co-accused Jitendra Ram and the victim in her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has denied the allegation of kidnapping. It has further been submitted that the daughter of this petitioner was murdered for which this petitioner had lodged Bochahan P.S.Case No.105 of 2016 for the offence u/s 302/34 of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21984 of 2018 (2) dt.26-04-2018 2/2 the IPC against the informant and others. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP opposed the submissions.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Judge-11-cum-ACJM, Muzaffarpur in connection with Bochahan P.S.Case No.224 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
B.Kr./- (Sanjay Kumar, J) U T