Anil Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23885 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2024 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Anil Kumar Ray S/o Hari Lal Ray R/o Village- Chakbahauddin Pannd, P.S.- Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the State :
Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025 Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 313 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 of the NDPS Act.
3. As per FIR, the petitioner is the Director of Sonakshi Shringar Mahal and Gift Corner and the allegation is that the petitioner was engaged in the illegal business of ganja. During a raid conducted at the petitioner's shop, 6.9 kgs of ganja, which was kept in cartons, was seized by the informant. Additionally, a sum of Rs. 38,830/- was seized from the counter of the said shop along with a motorcycle.
4. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing was recovered from his conscious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23885 of 2025(8) dt.23-12-2025 2/2 possession and he is not the owner of the shop.
5. The shop of the petitioner was raided and 6.9 kg of ganja was recovered from his shop. The FSL report has been submitted today in the Court and perusal of the same, shows that the contraband is ganja, which contains tetrahydrocannabinol (T.H.C).
6. In my view, the petitioner does not deserve the anticipatory bail, which is hereby rejected.
7. The office is directed to return the FSL report to the Director, FSL, Muzaffarpur, for its onward transmission to the learned court below in a sealed cover.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T