← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14212/2018withdrawn

Manoj Kumar Chaurasia And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-01-09Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14212 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== 1.

Manoj Kumar Chaurasia 2.

Sanjay Kumar Chaurasia 3.

Umesh Kumar Chaurasia all are sons of late Gopal Prasad Chaurasia Resident of Mo- Bhartiganj, P.S. SasaramT, District-Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Yamuna Prasad Singh Son of late Jugal Prasad Singh 3.

Satendra Kumar Singh S/o late Awadh Bihari Singh 4.

Ashok Kumar Pandey Son of Sri Ram Pujan Pandey 5.

Narendra Kumar Singh Son of Sri Ram Bachan Singh 6.

Ranjit Kumar Singh@ Dablu Singh Son of late Dadan Singh 7.

Sheopujan Singh Son of late Ram Dular Chaudhary 8.

Manoj Tiwari @ Pappu Tiwary Son of late Muni Tiwary 9.

Sri Ram Singh Son of late Beni Madhav Singh 10.

Sri Ram Rai Son of Ram Ashish Rai 11.

Shiv Ji Singh Son of Sri Gaya Singh All 2 to 11 are resident of MohallaShiv Colony, Fazalganj, Sasaram, P.S. SasaramModel, District- Rohtas. 12.

Kameshwar Rai Son of late Chhedi Rai Resident of Mo- Shiv Colony, Fazalganj, P.O. Sasaram P.S. Sasaram Model, District Rohtas. 13.

Haridwar Singh Son of Sri Kapilmuni Singh Resident of Mo- Hare Krishna Colony, Near South of Sasaram Model Police Station- PO- Sasaram P.S.- SasaramModel, District-Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bajarangi Lal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuranand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14212 of 2018(2) dt.09-01-2024 2/2 dispute has been resolved, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the present quashing application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T