Patna High CourtCWJC/3707/2011dfd for non appearance

Management Of Daya Engineering v. The Workmen Of Daya Engineerin

2015-05-06Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3707 of 2011 ====================================================== Management of Daya Engineering Works (Sleeper) Ltd. Manpur, Gaya through its Director, Sri Rakesh Ranjan, son of Nathun Sahu, resident of 187, AP Colony, Gaya, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Workmen of Daya Engineering Works (Sleeper) Ltd. Manpur, Gaya represented by District Engineering Shramik Sangh (Unit), Daya Engineering Works (Sleeper) Ltd. Manpur, Gaya through its General Secretary, Sri Yadu Mistri.

2. The Industrial Tribunal, Shram Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna through its Presiding Officer.

3. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Department of Labour, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent no.1 : Mr.Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Respondent no.3 : Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan, AC to GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1 submits that the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed on account of nondischarge of statutory obligation by the petitioner in terms of Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U