Sangita Devi @ Sangita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1159 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14549 of 2019 ====================================================== Sangita Devi @ Sangita Kumari W/o Ram Sewak Paswan Resident of Village- Bajaura, P.S.- Dobhi, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Dept. of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Secretary Dept. of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar.

4.

Sri Amir Subham Principal Secretary Dept. of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

Mr. Jitendra Kumar, the Secretary Dept. of Home (Police) Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6.

Mr. Deo Harayan Mandal Additional Secretary, Dept. of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

7.

Mr. A. Sangba Chuba, A.O. Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

8.

Mr. Abhishek Singh, The Collector/ Director Magistrate, Gaya. 9.

Mr. Rajeev Mishra the Superintendent of Police (S.P.) Gaya. 10.

Mr. Upendra Pandit, the Sub- Divisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya. 11.

Mr. Rabish Kumar Yadav the Dy. Superintendent of Police, Sherghati, Gaya. 12.

Mr. Niraj Kumar Roy, The Block Development Officer, Sherghati, Gaya. 13.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, The Circle Officer (C.O.) Sherghati, Gaya. 14.

Mr. Rahul Ranjan The Sub Inspector of Police, Dhobhi dhan, District- Gaya. 15.

Sri Sunil Kumar, Dy. Collector Establishment, Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-12-2024 Learned counsel for the respective parties are present.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been

Patna High Court MJC No.1159 of 2020(3) dt.10-12-2024 2/2 complied with and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition.

3. In view thereof, the present contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U