Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36266/2017rejected

Binod Tanti And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-12Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36266 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2017 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Binod Tanti son of Dasrath Tanti 2.

Kishore Tanti son of Dasrath Tanti 3.

Rohit Tanti son of Chhanguri Tanti 4.

Bal Mukund Tanti son of Chhanguri Tanti 5.

Chhanguri Tanti son of late Jagdeo Tanti 6.

Kailash Tanti @ Kailu Tanti son of Baisakhi Tanti All are residents of village - Mamalkha, P.S. Sabour, Distt Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pravin Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI BINOD KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Sabour P.S. case No. 64 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioners and the informant are agnates. There is case and counter case between the parties. The allegations levelled are general and omnibus. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned counsels appearing for the State and the informant opposes the prayer for bail and submit that there is allegation of assault against these petitioners supported by injury. During

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36266 of 2017(4) dt.12-09-2017 2/2 investigation, several witnesses have supported the prosecution case.

Considering the nature of allegations levelled and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this court does not find it to be a fit case for granting the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Their prayer for anticipatory bail is, therefore, rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T