Nirdosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24790 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2026 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Nirdosh Kumar S/o Uday Kumar Das Resident of Village - Madanpur, P.S. - Chakmehsi, District - Samastipur, At Present Punjabi Coloney, Gali No. 1, Police Station - Town, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 118(2) and 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant has gone on the shop of one Golu. Golu and his father were present there. The informant was talking with his friend, meanwhile, two persons on a bike arrived and started firing. One of them was apprehended and he was identified as the petitioner. This petitioner has disclosed that one co-accused Zafran has made firing.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24790 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR itself, it is clear that the allegation of firing is on co-accused Zafran. Learned counsel has submitted that in any view of the matter, the nature of injury is simple and the gun shot has hit in elbow of the father of Golu. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 01.02.2026 having no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 50 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-IInd, Samastipur. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T