Satyendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4441 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15203 of 2013 ====================================================== Satyendra Kumar Singh, Son of Shambhu Nath Yadav, resident of VillageMathiya, P.O.- Kaithi, Police Station- Began Gola, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Sri Abhyanand, the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.
3. Sri Upendra Kumar Sinha, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Bihar, Patna.
4. Sri Ajay Kumar Mishra, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.
5. Sri Anwar Hussain, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.
6. Sri Jayant Kant, the Chairman, Constable Selection Board, through the S.P., Buxar.
7. Sri Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, the Chairman, Constable Selection Board, through the S.P., Muzaffarpur.
8. Sri Manu Maharaj, the Chairman, Constable Selection Board, through the S.P., Darbhanga.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Nutan Kumari, AC to GA-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 30-06-2017 Considering the fact that the only direction issued in the writ petition was to consider the claim of the petitioner in terms of the order passed in CWJC No.5452 of 2013 (Ajay Kumar & Ors. Versus The State of Bihar & Ors.) and from the show cause filed by the respondents, it is seen that after consideration for various reasons, as are indicated therein, the respondents have taken a decision, now in this contempt
Patna High Court MJC No.4441 of 2014 (8) dt.30-06-2017 2/2 proceedings, no further action is required to be taken. In case, the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in which consideration is made and the case is decided, it gives a fresh cause to the petitioner to ventilate his grievance, but not to initiate an action for contempt.
The application stands disposed of.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- U