Kanchan Kumari @ Kanchan Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11185 of 2021 ====================================================== Kanchan Kumari @ Kanchan Devi wife of Rajnish Kumar Pandey resident of village - Pandey Dihari, Police Station- Karakat, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Rohtas.

5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Rohtas. 6.

Smt. Priyanka Devi wife of Ravi Shankar Tiwari Resident of village - Pandey Dihari, Police Station- Karakat, District- Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Kumari Amrita ( GP-3 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order (s), direction (s) for direction to the respondent authorities to produce the selection letter of respondent no.6 (namely Smt. Priyanka Kumari) who has illegally been selected on the post of Anganwari Sevika of Ward No.1 in Sonbarsa Panchayat and petitioner further prays for quashing the abovesaid selection letter of respondent No. 6 as Anganbari Sevika

Patna High Court CWJC No.11185 of 2021(2) dt.03-11-2023 2/2 and further respondents be directed to consider the case of petitioner for selection on the post of Anganbari Sevika of Ward No.1 in Sonbarsa Panchayat as she has more marks than respondent no.6 and to grant any other consequential relief (s) for which petitioner may found entitled in accordance with law."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U