← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17969/2018bail granted

Rajkumar Rishideo v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-29Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17969 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -397 Year- 2017 Thana -TRIVENIGANJ District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Rajkumar Rishideo S/o Nunulal Rishideo, R/o Village- Prasanna Pathra, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 19.2 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the recovery is alleged to have been made from the field situated at the back of house of the petitioner in abandoned state. Except for this, there is no other

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17969 of 2018 (2) dt.29-03-2018 substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 19.2 liters wine is recovered behind the house of the petitioner from an open field in abandoned state. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judgecum-Special Judge, Excise, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 397 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V./- U T