Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23863/2025dismissed

Raj Kishore Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-07Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23863 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-409 Year-2023 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Raj Kishore Kumar, son of Deep Narayan Singh, Resident of village - Gawpur, P.S. Ujiarpur, District-Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ambrish Kr Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. On 18.09.2024, the following order was passed: "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ujiyarpur P.S. Case No. 409 of 2023, lodged under Sections 392 and 411 of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution case, a loot was committed in C.S.P. Centre and co-accused Gopal Kumar Choudhary was arrested while committing the loot. During investigation, it has come that Raj Kishore Kumar (petitioner) has acted as a liner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2023 having two criminal cases pending against him, which is of similar and serious nature. The name of the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23863 of 2025(5) dt.07-11-2025 2/2 figured in this case by virtue of confessional statement of one Hariom Kumar.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there are two criminal antecedents of the petitioner of serious offences.

6. Considering the fact that the petitioner was involved in committing loot and his criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and therefore, the present bail application is hereby rejected."

3. During trial, witnesses have not been examined. Considering the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application is dismissed.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Samastipur is hereby directed to ensure appearance of the witnesses in the trial on the date fixed by the trial Court. Let a copy be faxed to the S.P. Samastipur.

5. If the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner may move for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) manish/- U