Satya Narayan Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3160 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10726 of 2006 ======================================================

1. Satya Narayan Das son of Late Jageshwar Das, resident of village Rajani, P.S. Murliganj, District Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the District Magistrate cum Collector, Madhepura

2. Sri Gopal Meena, son of not known, district Magistrate Cum Collector, Madhepura

3. Sri Bimal Kumar Singh, son of not known, Sub Divisional Officer, Madhepura

4. Sri Sudhir Kumar Sinha, son of not know, DCLR, Madhepura

5. Sri Ramautar Singh, son of not known, Circle Officer, Murliganj Block, Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Keeping in view the counter affidavit filed by the respondent and the assertion made therein that encroachment with respect to plot No.5523 has been removed, this Court on 22.5.2017 was inclined to dispose of the matter. However, learned counsel for the petitioner took time to seek instruction which was granted, but till date there is no rebuttal to the assertions made in the counter affidavit.

That being so, for the present, no action is required to be taken in the present matter.

Patna High Court MJC No.3160 of 2014 (4) dt.01-07-2017 2/2 In case the petitioner is aggrieved with the manner in which the encroachment has been removed, he may challenge the same in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding. With the aforesaid, this appeal is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- U