Md. Shamim Ansari And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33796 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1051 Year-2014 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

Md. Shamim Ansari and Ors Son of Late Hasim Ansari, resident of VillageMorcha Road, P.S. Chowk District Patna. 2.

Md. Sagir Ahmad @ Sagir Ahamad Son of Late Sher Mohammad, resident of Village- Haroon Nagar, P.S. Phulwari, District- Madhubani. 3.

Kamal Kumar Sinha Son of Parmeshwari Prasad resident of Village- Lohiya Nagar, P.S. Patrakar Nagar, District- Patna.

4.

Nand Gopal Sharma Son of Ram Wansh Sharma, resident of Village- Budha Colony, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna.

5.

Ravi Kant Prasad Son of Late Hira Das resident of Village- Pandarak P.S.- Pandarak District- Patna.

6.

Yogesh Praveen Son of late Ramashray Sinha, resident of Village- Tirmurti Nagar, P.S. Danapur, District- Patna.

7.

Shishupal Son of Vikrama Prasad, resident of Village- Lekha Nagar, P.S.- Khagaul, District- Patna.

8.

Dhirendra Kumar Son of Late Rajeshwer Sharma, resident of Mithapur, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar 2.

Raj Kumar Verma Son of Late Sudama Mahto, resident of Village- Nandu Tole, P.S. Khagaul District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahani, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the present quashing application with liberty to raise all the issues at the time of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33796 of 2016(2) dt.15-09-2023 2/2 framing of charge, if charges till date have not been framed.

3. Permission is accorded with the liberty aforesaid.

4. Accordingly, the present quashing application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T