Durgesh Anand v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27468 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2024 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== Durgesh Anand Son of Nityanand Ray R/o Village- Kapridih, P.S.- Chakai, Dist.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Chakai P.S Case No. 4 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 387 of I.P.C.
3. As per prosecution case, unknown person demanded ransom of Rs. 10 lakh from the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.01.2024.
5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27468 of 2024(2) dt.20-04-2024 2/2
6. On perusal of the FIR, impugned order, and other aspects of the case it appears that petitioner is not named in FIR name of the petitioner surfaced on the confessional statement of the co-accused person and also considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail after framing of the charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Judicial Magistate-1st , Jamui in connection with Chakai P.S Case No. 4 of 2024.
7. The trial court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the charge-sheet has not been submitted then the petitioner shall be released on bail on the above conditions and he shall be present physically on each and every date before the trial court till conclusion of the proceeding of framing of charge.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T