Shiv Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25690 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1023 Year-2019 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Shiv Ram Son Of Late Ramdev Ram R/O Village- Punas, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
Nirmala Devi Wife Of Shiv Ram, D/O Mohan Ram R/O Punas, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran At Present Chapra Govind, P.S.- Mehsi, District- East Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in registered under Sections 498A, 323, 341, 307, 406, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A/34 I.P.C.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25690 of 2023(2) dt.21-06-2023 2/3 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1023/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The petitioner is directed to co-operate during the trial. If the petitioner does not co-operate during the trial, the Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25690 of 2023(2) dt.21-06-2023 3/3 If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the Court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T