Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Maht v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3088 of 2011 ====================================================== Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Mahto S/O Ramdeo Singh @ Ramdeo Mahto, Resident of Village :- Khanpur, P.S.:- Khanpur, District - Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited through the Territorial Manager (LPG), Patna Exhibition Road, Patna

3. The Territorial Manager (LPG) Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (LPG), Patna Exhibition Road

4. The Central Bank of India through its Zonal Manager, Muzaffarpur Zone

5. The Branch Manage, Central Bank of India, Khanpur Branch Samastipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Respondent No.1 : Ms. Kalpana, AC to SC 19 For the Respondent No. 2 & 3: Mr. Madhuresh Prasad For the Respondent No. 4 & 5: Mr. Ajay Kr. Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2015 Though this case was earlier heard on 20th May, 2015 and on the request made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was adjourned enabling him to him file rejoinder to the separate counter-affidavits filed on behalf of the respondents.

When the matter has been taken up for consideration on merit today, Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that he has given no objection certificate and he has no instruction to press this writ petition. No other learned counsel is appearing on behalf of the petitioner. In above view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U