← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53236/2015dismissed

Rajnish Kumar @ Dindayal Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-05Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53236 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -319 Year- 2015 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== Rajnish Kumar @ Dindayal Sharma son of Brijnandan Sharma, resident of village- Sawajpura, P.O.- Jaipur, P.S.- Mahendia, District- Arwal (Bihar) at present Sri Krishna Nagar Ahari behind of B.L. Indo School, Madhukar Colony, Aurangabad (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Haque(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Aurangabad (Town) P.S. Case No. 319 of 2015 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad for the offences instituted under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, it is a case of murder of the informant's married daughter by the accused persons due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53236 of 2015 (3) dt.05-02-2016 2/2 behalf of the petitioner that from perusal of the medical prescription, it is evident that the deceased had died due to natural death.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and he is the husband of the deceased. Considering the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to release the above-named petitioner on anticipatory bail, the same is rejected.

Anyhow, if the petitioner surrenders in the court below within a period of four weeks and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order and, if possible, disposed of on the same day. (Sudhir Singh, J) kunal/- U T