← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29597/2024bail granted

Surendra Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-22Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29597 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-446 Year-2023 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== Surendra Chaudhary S/O Late Sudama Chaudhary R/O vill.- Khadda Kunjlahi, P.S.- Nautan, Dist.- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Amrit Kirti, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP1 For the Informant :

Mr. Alexender Ashok, Advocate Mr. Jawed Akhtar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 446/2023 (G.R. No. 4803/2023) dated 15.10.2023 registered for the offence punishable u/s 302, 120B and 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons along with an unknown miscreant are alleged to have committed murder of the informant's son by drowning him in the Bhagar river.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29597 of 2024(4) dt.22-08-2024 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted as per para. 27 of the case diary, the tower location of the petitioner was not found at the place of occurrence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that it is a case of last seen theory. It is further submitted that as per the post-mortem report, the cause of death is due to haemorrhage and shock. The anticipatory bail of the co-accused person has already been rejected by this court vide order dated 22.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22162/2024.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29597 of 2024(4) dt.22-08-2024 3/3 P.S. Case No. 446/2023 (G.R. No. 4803/2023).

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T