Patna High CourtC.R./541/2010withdrawn

Dr. Arun Kumar Singh v. Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh And O

2016-04-05Mr. Justice V. Nath2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Revision No.541 of 2010 ====================================================== Dr. Arun Kumar Singh, Son of Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of House No.28, Doctors Colony, Kankarbagh, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, Son of Late Ram Gulela Singh, Resident of House No.21, Patrakar Nagar, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, District-Patna.

2. M/s Raj Rani Hospital and Research Centre, a partnership firm at Kankarbagh, House No.21, Patrakar Nagar, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, District-Patna, through Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, Son of Late Ram Gulela Singh, Resident of House No.21, Patrakar Nagar, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, District-Patna.

3. Dr. Mrs. Anita Singh, Wife of Dr. Arun Kumar Singh, Resident of House No.28, Doctors Colony, Patrakar Nagar, P.S.-Patrakar Nagar, District-Patna.

4. Smt. Bhuneshwari Singh, Wife of Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh.

5. Sri Binay Kumar Singh, Son of Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh. Both residents of House No.21, Doctors Colony, Patrakar Nagar, P.S.- Patrakar Nagar, District-Patna. ------Opposite Parties. ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jashawir Singh Arora, Adv. Mr. Ravi Bhatia Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 05-04-2016 Mr. J.S.Arora, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that after the death of the opposite party no.1 Dr.Rajeshwar Prasad Singh who was the father of the petitioner, the situation has changed and therefore the petitioner does not want to pursue this revision application any further. However, the prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner to withdraw this revision application with liberty to the petitioner to raise any objection which may be available to him in accordance with law in view of the changed circumstances. Mr. Alamdar Hussain, learned counsel who

Patna High Court C.R. No.541 of 2010 (33) dt.05-04-2016 has appeared for opposite party nos. 4 and 5 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

The prayer is allowed.

The revision application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise objection (s) which may be available to him in accordance with law in view of the changed circumstances as abovementioned.

(V. Nath, J) Nitesh/- U