Md. Gulab And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2864 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2017 Thana -PATEPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Md. Gulab

2. Sirajul Haque @ Md. Sirajul Haque

3. Manna Devi &

4. Nazni Praveen @ Nazmi Praveen .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Patepur P.S. Case No. 84 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are family members of husband of the deceased. The husband of the deceased is already in custody.

From the written report itself, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. The relationship of the petitioners with the deceased is mentioned in paragraph-10 of the bail petition.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2864 of 2018 (2) dt.19-01-2018 2/2 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Patepur P.S. Case No. 84 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will liable to cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T